gre考試備考時(shí)間不夠該如何給寫(xiě)作減負(fù)

gre考試備考時(shí)間不夠該怎樣給寫(xiě)作“減負(fù)”一共有多少題目gre寫(xiě)作有一個(gè)特點(diǎn)，也是我們應(yīng)當(dāng)利用的特點(diǎn)：它的題庫(kù)是完整公然的。我們最后在上碰到的題目會(huì)直接從題庫(kù)中抽取而出，不會(huì)做任何改變。所以，理論上講，只需我們提早準(zhǔn)備好全部題目，

GRE寫(xiě)作的高分是絕對(duì)能保障的，這一點(diǎn)和

GRE的語(yǔ)文和數(shù)學(xué)都不同樣。看完題庫(kù)以后，大家應(yīng)當(dāng)意氣消沉了。不用數(shù)了，

Issue

部分題目：

152道。Argument

題目：177道。這樣的“天文數(shù)字”，仿佛讓我們無(wú)從下手，可是真的有這么多道題目嗎不是的

!仔細(xì)的同學(xué)應(yīng)當(dāng)會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)，無(wú)論是

Issue

仍是

Argument，有好多題目的題干是高度相像甚至是完整同樣的，重復(fù)率幾乎為

50%。這樣一來(lái)，

Issue

部分我們需要準(zhǔn)備的題目數(shù)目就變?yōu)榱耍?/p>

152/2=76，Argument

部分我們需要準(zhǔn)備的題目數(shù)目就變?yōu)榱耍?/p>

177/2≈89。題庫(kù)直接減小了一半。但即使這樣，

gre

考試題目數(shù)目仍是好多，有沒(méi)有方法再減少一些呢

?要減負(fù)，就減負(fù)得狠一些gre

考生們自己在準(zhǔn)備時(shí)，簡(jiǎn)單墮入一個(gè)對(duì)題目的錯(cuò)誤分類(lèi)方式

(或說(shuō)是不高效的分類(lèi)方式)：Issue

依據(jù)“領(lǐng)域

(即藝術(shù)、治、科技、教育等

)”分類(lèi)，

Argument

依據(jù)“經(jīng)典邏輯錯(cuò)誤(臆造因果，錯(cuò)誤類(lèi)比等

)”分類(lèi)。這樣的分類(lèi)方式合用于老

GRE，假如考生依舊依據(jù)這樣的分類(lèi)方式，很有可能就會(huì)墮入誤區(qū)。那么，新

GRE的題目分類(lèi)方式應(yīng)當(dāng)是依據(jù)什么呢

?一個(gè)詞，Instruction。Instruction又叫Direction，中文意思是“詳細(xì)性指令”或“寫(xiě)作要求”。題當(dāng)今面這段斜體字就是Instruction。以前有同學(xué)跟我們反應(yīng)說(shuō)：“以前認(rèn)為每道題目下邊的這個(gè)斜體字都是同樣的，所以根本不看”不看

Instruction

的結(jié)果很沉重，

ETS明確說(shuō)，假如不依據(jù)

Instruction

，最高分不會(huì)超過(guò)三分。而Issue中間一共有6種Instruction，Argument中間一共有4種對(duì)我們行文都有不同的要求。這樣看來(lái)，在面對(duì)新GRE時(shí)，我們應(yīng)當(dāng)依據(jù)

InstructionInstruction

，每一種來(lái)對(duì)題這樣一來(lái)，我們需要準(zhǔn)備的題目的類(lèi)型數(shù)目即為：

Issue6

道，Argument4

道。加在一同是10道題目，是本來(lái)總題目數(shù)目的3%。這個(gè)減負(fù)力度，夠狠了吧。假如只有一周了，練幾篇這個(gè)問(wèn)題也真是把我們上了死路。但還剩一周才來(lái)看作文的同學(xué)其實(shí)也不在少量。在這樣的時(shí)間節(jié)點(diǎn)上，由于Argument的套路性更強(qiáng)，模板也更好用，所以更好拿分，我們會(huì)告訴大家：“保Argument，爭(zhēng)Issue”。即把重點(diǎn)放在Argument上邊，而Issue部分只需要理解寫(xiě)作重點(diǎn)，實(shí)在沒(méi)有時(shí)間就能夠不做全文練習(xí)了。這樣一來(lái)，我們面對(duì)GRE寫(xiě)作，最少應(yīng)當(dāng)練——4篇。題目："petitionisultimatelyrebeneficialthandetrimentaltosociety."歸根結(jié)底，競(jìng)爭(zhēng)關(guān)于是利多弊少。正文：Darwinsuggestedthattheprocessofevolutionisonebasedonpetition.Thisdeadlypetitionweedsouttheweakandonlythefittestofthespeciessurvives.Humans,beingtheproductofmillionsofyearsofevolution,arebynature,petitivebeings.Yet,humansarealsosocialbeings.Likethebeesinthehive,wearenotverysuccessfullivingpletelyonourown.Weneedtocooperatewithotherindividualsforoursurvival.Thus,aconflictensues,betweenourinnatepetitiveness,andourneedtocooperate.Thereareprosandconsassociatedwithboth.However,itismybeliefthatoverall,petition,isredetrimentalthanbeneficialtohumansociety.First,letustrytoidentifywhythereispetitioninthefirstplace.Inanenvironmentabundantwithresources,wheresupplyoutstripsdemand,thereisverylittleneedfortheinhabitantstofightwitheachotheroverthem.Thisisnotthecaseonplanetearth.Resourcesarelimited,andthereisconstantjostlingtogettothefrontoftheueuetogetacuirethem.Forexample,thousandsofprospectivestudentsapplytogainentrancetotopuversitiesaroundtheworld,butthereareonlyahandfulofplacesinthoseuversities.Thus,thereispetitiontogetintotothesehallowedinstXXtionsofhigherlearng.Fromautilitarianperspective,petitionisagoodthing.Inevolutionitisresnsiblefortheeliminationof"weak"genes.Inthebusinessenvironment,itgetsridoftheweakerplayers.Inlitics,itweedsoutunpularcandidates.Inacademia,itgetsridofweakstudents.Furtherre,petitionleadstoselfimprovement.Businesseswillstrivetoofferbetterproductsandservicesatlesserprices.Theconsumerreapsrichrewardsfromthispetitivespirit.liticiansstrivetodotheutstforthepeople,sotheywouldgetreelected.Studentsexcelintherestudies,tryingtooutdoeachother.Thus,ostensibly,petitionisresnsibleforthebettermentofthesocietyasaXXle.However,thisisjustthesuperficialview.Underththesuce,petition,ineveryaspect,isslowlyeatingawayattheveryfabricofthesociety.Whileitistruetosaythatpetitionincorrateworldhasbroughtgreatbenefitstotheconsumer,thesocietyas"MissedAhere"XXleisplayingagreatpriceforit.stbusinessesareexploitingcheaplabourinthethirdworldtomaximisetheirprofits.TherearethousandsofsweatshopsrunbywellknownwesterncorrationsincountrieslikeIndonesia,BangladeshandChina.Peopleareforcedtoworkinsualidconditions,often16hoursaday.TheyareluckytorXXiveadollaradayfortherelabours.Thementagovernmentinanyofthesecountriestrytoimprovetheworkingconditionsoftheemployees,thesemultinationalgiantsfleethecountry,oftenleingXXlemutiecingfinancialn.Thecorrationsareawarethatthereareplentyofotherlabourmarketsthatcouldbeexploitedwithgayabandon.Thatisjustthehumancost.Whatabouttheenvironmentalcosts?petitionhasforcedmanycorrationsto"streamline"theiroperations.Environmentalstandardsarenormallythefirstvictimsofthis"streamline"process.Asigficantauntofenvironmentalllutionandlanddegradationhasbeenblamedonindustry,yetthefactorieskeepproducingreandre.Thousandsofitemsgounsoldeachyearduetopetition.Onlyafractionofthismerndiseisrecycled.Therestgoestothealreadyoverflowinglandfills.GRE寫(xiě)作題目：Muchoftheinformationthatpeopleassumeisfactualactuallyturnsouttobeinaccurate.Thus，anypiXXofinformationreferredtoasa‘fact’shouldbemistrustedsinceitmaywellbeprovenfalseinthefuture.大部分人們認(rèn)為是事實(shí)的信息結(jié)果實(shí)質(zhì)上都是不正確的。所以，任何據(jù)稱(chēng)是事實(shí)的信息都應(yīng)當(dāng)被懷疑，由于它在未來(lái)很可能會(huì)被證明為是錯(cuò)誤的。GRE寫(xiě)作范文：ShouldwebedoubtfultoalltheinformationathandsbXXusetherightnessofwhichisuncertain?Thespeakerclaimsso，Iconcedethatpeopleoftenmitvariousfallaciesinthecourseofcogzingthings

，howeverIfundamentallytakeexceptionofthearguer'sassertiontomistrusteveryfactwemightencounter.AndIwillsubstantiallydiscussmyviewsthereinafter.Tobeginwith，thespeakerseemstoimplicatethatafactwouldbeprovenfalseinthefutureundernumerousumstance.NeverthelessIprefertoarguerthatfactsnevernge.NomatterhowdidtheMedievalChurchandInuisitionpersecuteBruno，thefactneverngesthattheearthisfarfrombeingthXXnteroftheuverseasthereligioussovereignshadassumedorhopedfor，whilejustaminorparticleinit.Eually，nomatterhowEdisonhadtriedtoincitethepublicfearanddistrusttothealternativecurrentelectricity，thefactneverngesthatTeals’electricalsystemisvastlysuperiortohisdirectcurrentelectricalone，andwouldbeacceptedandappliedinlargerrange.However，whatdongearethehuman'sobjectiveinterpretationstofacts.Onepellingargumenttothisintisthat，duetothelimitationofhuman’sknowledgeandprehensivecapability，theytendtomakeinsufficientorevenfalseunderstandingtothecertainfact.Anaptillustrationisthengesofcogtiontodisease.Whileattheancienttime，ourprogetorsbelievedtheamanbeingapatientforthereasonthathehadconductcrimesoroffendedsomeghostsorspirits，thecontemrarypeoplehewellknowthatthevariesofpathogensarethebasiccausestoourdiseases，andthedefectsofourimmunesystemandsofortharealsothefactorsaswell.Anotherargumentforthengeofprehensiontofactisthatdifferentpeoplealwaysobserveandinterpretfromdifferentperspectives.ThoughtheRelativitytheoryisnotwellpliablewiththeuantumme，noonecallthegreatnessofbothEinsteinandBohr，bXXusetheirtheoriesarebasedondistinctviews，theformerfromthemacrocoandthelaterfromthemicroco.Notwithstandingtheforegoingreasonsforthathumantendtomakefallaciesduringthecauseofprehendingandcogzingfacts，thesereasonsshouldneverbetheexcusestodoubteveryconclusionwemightdrawfromfacts.Basedoncertainrationalinferenceandproperknowledgefundament，theconclusionswemakemightwellbejustifiable，ifnotpletelyright，tocertaindegree.Whatweneedtodoistoprotetheenterpriseofpursuingthebetteranswerandtrytousetheresultwehegettoapplication，inst