版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
Incollaborationwith
〉
BIGIDEAS
RESEARCHREPORT
MITsloan
ManagementReview
November2025
TheEmerging
AgenticEnterprise:HowLeaders
MustNavigateaNewAgeofAI
bySamRansbotham,DavidKiron,ShervinKhodabandeh,SeshIyer,andAmartyaDas
AUTHORS
SamRansbotham
isaprofessorofanalyticsattheCarrollSchoolofManagementatBostonCollege,aswellasguesteditorforMITSloanManagementReviewsArtificialIntelligenceandBusinessStrategyBigIdeasinitiative.
DavidKironistheeditorialdirector,research,ofMITSloanManagementReviewandprogramleadforitsBigIdeasresearchinitiatives.
ShervinKhodabandehisamanagingdirectorandseniorpartneratBostonConsultingGroup(BCG)andthecoleaderofitsAIbusiness
inNorthAmerica.HeisaleaderinBCGX
andhasover20yearsofexperiencedriving
businessimpactfromAIanddigital.Hecanbecontactedat
shervin@
.
SeshIyerisamanagingdirectorandsenior
partneratBCGandtheNorthAmericachairforBCGX,wherehehelpsclientsdrive
large-scaleAItransformations.Heisthe
globalleaderfortheAI&TechLabattheBCGHendersonInstituteandcanbereachedat
sesh@
.
AmartyaDasisaprincipalatBCGand
currentlyservesasanambassadorattheBCGHendersonInstitute,whereheleadsresearchontheimpactoftechnologyandAIonsociety,focusingonhowemergingtechnologiesreshapebothcompaniesandpublicinstitutions.Hecanbereachedat
das.amartya@
.
CONTRIBUTORS
ToddFitz,KevinFoley,SarahJohnson,MattLangione,MicheleLeeDeFilippo,AmandaLuther,JenniferMartin,SamanthaOldroyd,MeenalPore,AllisonRyder,TaylorZhang,LeilaZhu,
LeonidZhukov,DavidZuluagaMartínez
TheresearchandanalysisforthisreportwasconductedunderthedirectionoftheauthorsaspartofanMITSloanManagementReviewresearchinitiativeincollaborationwithandsponsoredby
BostonConsultingGroup.
Tocitethisreport,pleaseuse:
S.Ransbotham,D.Kiron,S.Khodabandeh,S.Iyer,andA.Das,“TheEmergingAgenticEnterprise:HowLeadersMustNavigateaNewAgeofAI,”MITSloanManagementReviewandBoston
ConsultingGroup,November2025.
SUPPORTINGSPONSORS
BCG
HENDERSONINSTITUTE
BCG》《
/10.63383/jAXE2583
Copyright?MassachusettsInstituteofTechnology,2025.Allrightsreserved.REPRINT#:67270
CONTENTS
1
Introduction
4
StrategicTensionsWhenAdoptingAgenticAI
1
1
AStrategicOverhaulofWorkflows,Governance,
Roles,andInvestment
17
Conclusion
18
Appendix
Introduction
Executiveshavelongreliedonsimplecategoriestoframehowtechnologyfitsintoorganizations:Toolsautomatetasks,peoplemakedecisions,andstrategydetermineshowthetwoworktogether.Thatframingisnolongersufficient.Anewclassofsys-tems—agenticAI—complicatestheseboundaries.Thesesystemscanplan,act,andlearnontheirown.Theyarenotjusttoolstobeoperatedorassistantswaitingforinstructions.Increasingly,theybehavelikeautonomousteammates,capableofexe-cutingmultistepprocessesandadaptingastheygo.Notably,76%ofrespondentstoourglobalexecutivesurveysaytheyviewagenticAIasmorelikeacoworkerthanatool.
Forstrategists,agenticAI’sdualnatureasbothatoolandcoworkercreatesnewdilemmas.Asingleagentmighttakeoveraroutinestep,supportahumanexpertwithanalysis,andcollaborateacrossworkflowsinwaysthatshiftdecision-makingauthority.Thistool-coworkerdualitybreaksdowntraditionalmanagementlogic,whichassumesthattechnologyeithersubstitutesorcomplements,auto-matesoraugments,islabororcapital,orisatooloraworker,butnotallatonce.Organizationsnowfaceanunprecedentedchallenge:managingasinglesystemthatdemandsbothhumanresourceapproachesandassetmanagementtechniques.
Theseparationoftechnologyandstrategyinsidemostorganizationsexacerbatesthischallenge.Technologyexecutivesfocusontechnologyissues,makingpilot,vendor,orinfrastructuredecisions.Strategicexecutivesfocusonmarkets,competition,andpeople.ButagenticAImakesthatseparationuntenable.Itsimultaneouslyinfluencesthedesignofprocesses,thestructureofroles,theallocationofdecisionrights,andthecultureofaccountability.
ABOUTTHERESEARCH
ThisreportpresentsfindingsfromtheninthannualglobalresearchstudyonartificialintelligenceandbusinessstrategybyMITSloanManagementReviewandBostonConsultingGroup.Inspring2025,wefieldedaglobalsurveyandsubsequentlyanalyzedrecordsfrom2,102respondentsrepresentingmorethan21industriesand116countries.Wealsointerviewed11executivesleadingAIinitiativesinabroadrangeofcompaniesandindustries,includingfinancialservices,technology,retail,energy,andhealthcare.
OurresearchexaminesthespeedofagenticAIadoptioninsideorganizations,whichhasoutpacedtheadoptionoftraditionalandgenerativeAI.ExploringhowagenticAIrelatestocapitalandlabor,thisreportoutlinesaseriesofresultanttensionsandofferssuggestionsfororganizationsseekingtoresolvethem.
1
TheEmergingAgenticEnterprise:HowLeadersMustNavigateaNewAgeofAI
2
MITSLOANMANAGEMENTREVIEW?BCG
TheEmergingAgenticEnterprise:HowLeadersMustNavigateaNewAgeofAI3
ATidalWaveofAdoption,aTrickleofStrategy
Despitethetechnology’swide-rangingimplications,organizationsarerapidlyadoptingagenticAI,wellbeforetheyhaveastrategyinplace.TheiradoptionoftraditionalAIhasclimbedto72%overthepasteightyears,accord-ingtooursurvey.(seefigure1.)GenerativeAIachieved70%adoptioninjustthreeyears.Injusttwoyears,agenticAIhasalreadyreached35%adoption,withanother44%oforganizationsplanningtodeployitsoon.Vendorsareacceleratingthistrendbyembeddingagenticcapabilitiesasfeaturesintheirofferings,causingorganizationstoimple-mentagenticAIbeforetheyhavedevelopedastrategicmanagementframework.
Theresultisagrowingstrategicrisk:AgenticAIisspread-ingacrossenterprisesfasterthanleaderscanredesignprocesses,assigndecisionrights,orrethinkworkforce
models.Ourresearch,basedon2,000-plusrespondentstoaglobalsurveyandinterviewswithleadingexecutives,findsthatorganizationshavemultipleoptionsforobtain-ingvaluefromagenticAI.Itofferspossibilitiesnotonlytoimprovecostefficiencybutalsotoexpandrevenue,accelerateinnovation,compresslearningcurves,andrestructureorganizations.Withoutastrategicapproachthatalignstheseobjectives,organizationsrisklimitingreturnsontheirinvestments.
TheExecutiveDilemma
AgenticAI’sdualnatureasbothatoolandcoworkercreatescompetingorganizationalpressuresthatman-agementframeworkscannotresolve.ITleaderswantpredictable,scalablesystemswithcleartechnicalspecifi-cations.CFOsneedinvestmentmodelswithmeasurablereturnsanddepreciationschedules.HRexecutivesrequire
PercentageoforganizationsusingAI
%
100
80
52%50%
40
20
0
201720182019202020212022202320242025
Source:MITSloanManagementReview-BCGglobalexecutivesurveys,2017-2025.
53%44%
70%72%
57%56%
46%
60
FIGURE1
TraditionalAIAdoptionContinuestoGrow
Since2023,thepercentageoforganizationspilotingordeployingAIsolutionshasrisen22percentagepoints.
performancemanagementframeworksandsupervisionprotocols.Businessleadersdemandbothefficiencyandadaptabilityfromthesamesystem.
Thesecompetingdemandsaren’timplementationchal-lenges.They’restrategicimperativesthatexposenewsourcesoforganizationaldifferentiation.Amongorganiza-tionswithextensiveagenticAIuse,wefindthat73%believeusingAIfundamentallyincreasestheirabilitytostandout,while76%oftheiremployeesbelieveitchangeshowindi-vidualsdifferentiatethemselvesfromcoworkers.
OrganizationsandindividualscanuseagenticAItodif-ferentiatethemselvesbecausetheycannowtakeadvan-tageofthewaysthatagenticAIdoesnotfittraditionalmanagementframeworks.Thesamesystemthatofferscostreductionsthroughtool-likeautomationalsoenablesrevenueexpansionthroughworkerlikeadaptability,innovationaccelerationthroughcontinuouslearning,andorganizationallearningthroughhuman-agentinter-actions.Butaccessingthesemultiplesourcesofvaluerequiresnavigatingoperationaltensionsthatnoexistingframeworkaddresses.
Thepathforwardrequiresunderstandingfouropera-tionaltensionsthatexposetheinadequacyoftraditionalmanagementapproachesandthenredesigningfunda-mentalprocesses—workdesign,governance,work-forceplanning,learning,andinvestment—toworkwithratherthanagainstagenticAI’sinherentduality.Thisreportoffersevidence-basedrecommendationsonhowtoproceed.
StrategicTensionsWhenAdoptingAgenticAI
Thecompetingpressuresexecutivesfacearen’tabstracttheoreticalproblems.Theymanifestasspecific,irrecon-cilableconflictsinday-to-dayoperations.Ourresearchidentifiedfourdistincttensionsthatemergewhenorga-nizationstrytointegrateagenticAIintoexistingwork-flows.Eachtensionrepresentsafundamentalclashbetweenestablishedmanagementprinciples,forcingleaderstochoosetoeitherapplyincompatibleapproachesordevelopentirelynew,hybridframeworks.Successfullynavigatingthischallengerequiresthatleadersmanagethefollowingtensions:
1.Sca1abi1ityversusadaptabi1ity.Toolsscale
predictably;workersadaptdynamically.Agentic
AI’sabilitytodobothsimultaneouslyrequiresneworganizationaldesignprinciples.
2.Experienceversusexpediency.Whenistherighttimetoinvestinagenticsystemsandhowshouldthoseinvestmentsbemade?Leadersarefacedwithbalancinglong-termcapabilitybuildingwithshort-termreturns.
WHYAGENTICAISPREADSSOFAST
TherapidadoptionofagenticAIalignsperfectlywiththediffu-sionofinnovationstheory,whichexplainswhysometechnol-ogiesspreadfasterthanothers.iAccordingtotheframework,innovationsdiffusemorequicklywhentheyofferaclearrelativeadvantage,arecompatiblewithexistingsystems,aresimpletotry,andhaveobservableresults.
AgenticAIexcelsonallfourdimensions.Itbuildsonthefamil-iarityofgenerativeAIthatorganizationshavealreadyadopted,integratesseamlesslyintowidelyusedplatforms,requiresmin-imalnewinfrastructureforexperimentationwithit,anddeliv-ersimmediate,visibleproductivitybenefits.AsChevron’schiefdataandanalyticsofficer,MargeryConnor,explains,“Withthecompanystandardizedonasinglevendor’splatform,morethanhalfoftheworkforcehasaccesstoAItools,and,byextension,accesstoagenticAI.”Theinfrastructureisalreadythere.
Thisbuilt-inavailabilitydramaticallyreducesbarrierstoadop-tion.Employeescanbeginusingagenticfeatureswithoutimplementingentirelynewsystems,whichencouragesorganicexperimentationacrosstheorganization.Asmorepeopleexpe-riencetangiblebenefits,adoptionacceleratesthroughwordofmouthandviademonstrationeffects—exactlywhatdiffusiontheorypredicts.
Theimplicationforleaders:AgenticAI’srapidspreadisn’tanaccident.It’shappeningbecausethetechnologyisdesignedtominimizeadoptionfriction.Thismeansthatcompetitivebene-fitswillcomenotfromearlyaccesstothetechnologybutfromsuperiororganizationaldesignaroundit.
4MITSLOANMANAGEMENTREVIEW?BCG
TheEmergingAgenticEnterprise:HowLeadersMustNavigateaNewAgeofAI5
3.Supervisionversusautonomy.Howdoyou
supervisesomethingdesignedtoworkautonomously?
Traditionaloversightmodelsassumeeitherfullhuman
controlorcompleteautomation,notsystemsthatrequiresomehumancontrolanddifferingdegreesofautomation.
4.Retrofitversusreengineer.When,andbyhowmuch,shouldorganizationschangeprocesses?Thatdecisionrequiresresourcesandattentionthatmostchange-managementframeworksdon’taddress.
Theorganizationsthatwillsucceedarethosethatrec-ognizeagenticAI’sdualnatureasafeature,notabug.Strategiesthatembracetheambiguityanddevelophybridapproachesratherthanforcingthesesystemsintoexistingmanagementcategoriesbenefitfromboththeirtool-likescalabilityandworkerlikeadaptability.
1.TheFlexibilityTension:ScalabilityVersusAdaptability
Humanworkersaremaximallyflexible.Theycanswitchtasks,learnnewskills,andadapttounexpectedsitua-tionswithminimalretraining.Toolsaremuchlessflexible.Machineryandinfrastructureexcelatspecificpurposesandscalepredictably,buttheycanstruggletoadapttochange.
AgenticAIsitsinbetween:moreadaptablethantoolsbut(currently)lessflexiblethanworkers.Howshouldorga-nizationsdesignprocesseswithintermediateflexibility?AgenticAI’sabilitytoscalepredictablyandadaptdynam-icallyrequiresneworganizationaldesignprinciplesthatdon’tfitneatlyintoexistingmanagementsystems.
IntheheartofGoodwillIndustries’bustlingsortingfacil-ity,ariverofdonationsflowsceaselesslywithachaoticmixofvintageT-shirts,designerjeans,andforgottenfabrics.Ateamofdedicatedworkerspainstakinglysiftsthroughthismountainoftextiles,butAIagentsareincreasinglyabletohelp.Thissystemisnotasimplecom-putervisionmachine,rigidlyprogrammedtorecognizeonlyafewspecificitems.Instead,itisaflexibleAIthatconstantlylearnsfromandadaptstotheever-changingstreamofgoods:Itcanlearntodistinguishbetweenacashmeresweaterandawoolblend,identifyararecol-lectiblefromacommontoy,andevenspotsubtlesignsofwearandtearthatmightmakeanitemunsuitableforresale.StevePreston,presidentandCEOofGoodwill,says,“Oursupplychainfrombeginningtoendisverycomplicatedandrequiresalotofhumanintervention,alotofdecisionpoints,andalotofjudgment.Sothroughout
OurresearchidentifiedfourdistincttensionsthatemergewhenorganizationstrytointegrateagenticAIintoexistingworkflows.
thatprocess,weseealotofopportunitiestoincorporateAIintheentireflowofgoods,thedecision-makingpro-cess,andmakingsurethateverythingwereceivefindsitsbesthomesomewhereinthecycle.”
AI’sRole
Coach
Mentor
Colleague
Rival
Boss
Assistant
GoodwillispilotingAItechnologythatcouldultimatelybeusedtosortbillionsofpoundsofdonationseachyear,
ensuringthateachitemfindsitswaytotherightplace,whetherit’saboutique,anonlinestore,orarecyclingfacil-ity.TheAI’sabilitytohandlecomplexjudgmenttasksisencouragingleaderstoreplaceadecades-old,human-centricworkflowwithnewprocesses.TheyhavebeguntodesignprocessesforandwithagenticAI.
13%
42%
12%
36%
11%
35
%
8%
26%
5%
18%
26%
61%
%05101520253035404550556065
NowIn3years
FIGURE2
AI’sRoleintheOrganization
OurdatashowssurveyrespondentsbelieveAIwillbecomemorelikeanassistant,coach,mentor,orcolleagueratherthanarivalorboss.
6MITSLOANMANAGEMENTREVIEW?BCG
TheEmergingAgenticEnterprise:HowLeadersMustNavigateaNewAgeofAI7
Asthecompositionofworkersshifts,deployingscalable,flexibleAIworkerscreatesastrategictensionforprocessdesignacrosstheenterprise.
AIsystemsalreadyactasassistants,colleagues,mentors,coaches,andevenasrivalsandbosses.MostofoursurveyrespondentsanticipatethatAIwillbecomemoreinvolvedineachoftheseroleswithinthreeyears.(seefigure2,page6.)Asthecompositionofworkersshifts,deployingscalable,flexibleAIworkerscreatesastrategictensionforprocessdesignacrosstheenterprise.Agenticsystemsmightworkbestinstandardizedenvironments,butover-standardizationcaneliminatetheirabilitytolearnanddevelophumanlikeadaptability—acapabilitythatcanhelporganizationshan-dleedgecasesandsystemfailures.Organizationsneedboththeefficiencyofstandardizedprocessesandtheflexibilityofhumanlikeimprovisation.
Thethreat:OrganizationsthatoptimizeforAIefficiencymissoutonAI’shumanlikeadaptiveresponsestosystemfailuresorunexpectedmarketshifts.
Theopportunity:CompaniesthatstriketherightbalancecanachievebothAI-drivenefficiencyandhuman-poweredadaptability,creatingstrategicbenefits.
2.TheInvestmentTension:ExperienceVersusExpediency
Traditionaltoolsrequirelargeupfrontcostsbutdeliverpredictablereturnsthroughestablisheddepreciationschedules.Humanworkersareanongoingvariableexpense,buttheirvalueappreciateswithexperienceandtraining.AgenticAIdefiesbothmodels,requiringsub-stantialinitialdevelopmentcostsandongoingvariablecosts,suchastrainingmodelsonnewdata.Whilemanytechnologysystemsrequireongoingmaintenance,agen-ticAIsystemssimultaneouslydepreciatethroughmodeldriftwhileappreciatingthroughfine-tuningandemergent
capabilities.ShouldinvestmentsinagenticAIbeviewedmorelikeinvestmentsintoolsorinworkers,orboth?
Directlyaddressingthatquestionrevealstwocriticalinvestmenttensionsthatchallengeconventionalfinan-cialplanning:
Timing:Themoving-targetprob1em.AIsystemsareevolvingquickly,creatinguncertaintyaboutwhenanorga-nizationshouldmakesignificantinvestmentsinthem.Adopttooearlyandrisktechnologicalobsolescence;waittoolongandriskstrategicbenefits.AsJeffReihl,execu-tivevicepresidentandtechnologychairmanatLexisNexisLegal&Professional,observes,“Thistechnologyischangingsofast,wemighthavetodoaquickcatch-up.”Chevron’schiefdataandanalyticsofficer,MargeryConnor,echoesthissentiment,describingtheneedtoremainadap-tivetoemergingtoolsandupdates:“Thefast-paceddevel-opmentofagenticAIrequiresorganizationstobeagilewhileconsistentlyupholdingtheirdataandAIgovernancestandards,”shesays.
Unliketraditionaltoolswithpredictableupgradecycles,agenticAIrequirescontinuousadaptationandlearning.Standardnetpresentvaluecalculationsfailwhenthemostvaluableapplicationshaven’tbeenconceivedyet,andconventionaltimingmodelscan’taccountforthespeedoftechnologicalevolution.Plus,applyingconventionalreplacementschedulesrisksrapidvaluedecayassystemsfallbehindthetechnologicalcurve.
Size:P1atformsversuspointso1utions.Largeorga-nizationsfaceafundamentalchoice:investheavilyincomprehensiveAIplatformsorpursuesmaller,targetedpointsolutions.Thescaleofrequiredinvestmentforeach
approachcanvarydramatically,makingitdifficulttoaccu-ratelygaugeupfrontandcontinuingcosts.
Platforminvestmentsdemandsubstantialupfrontcom-mitmentswithuncertainreturns.AtCapitalOne,PremNatarajan,executivevicepresident,chiefscientist,andheadofenterpriseAI,describesbuilding“dozensofusecasesatscale”fromasingle,substantialplatforminvest-ment.ThefullimpactofCapitalOne’sstrategycanbeassessedthroughthelensesoftechnologyexploitationandexploration.Similarly,WalterSun,seniorvicepresi-dentandglobalheadofAIatSAP,explainsthatcreating“agenerativeAIhub”allowsforfulllife-cyclemanagementoflargelanguagemodels,whereasbuildingLLMsindivid-uallyintoisolatedapplicationsrequiresthecostlyintegra-tionoflegacysystemsbeforeanyreturnsmaterialize.SAPfocusedonthevaluetothedeveloperecosystemandusedthattodeterminewhatwouldbeasufficientreturnfromhavingaplatform,Sunnotes.
InvestinginpointsolutionsoffersmorepredictablecostsandmeasurablereturnsbutrisksmissingthecompoundvaluethatemergeswhenAIcapabilitiesareintegratedacrossbusinessfunctions.Organizationsthatchoosethispathmayfindthemselvesmanagingdozensofdiscon-nectedAItoolswithouttheinfrastructuretoscaleoradapt.
Organizationsinvestingsolelyinoneapproach,whetherhuman-in-the-loopsystemsorfullyautonomousagents,missthecompoundvaluecreatedbyagenticAI’scon-tributionsinmultipledecision-makingscenarios.Eachautonomylevelservesdifferentrisktolerancesandbusi-nesscontexts,butmeasuringROIinisolationobscuresthestrategicvalueofadiversifiedAIportfolio.
AgenticAI’shybridfeaturesmakeitdifficulttoaccu-ratelymeasureinvestmentreturnsovermeaningfultimeframesoreventoassessupfrontinvestmentrequirements.CompaniesmeasuringagenticAIreturnsthroughconven-tionaldepreciationschedulessystematicallyundervaluethecontinuous-learningandemergentcapabilitiesthesesystemsgenerate,failingtoaccountforsignificantportionsofactualvaluecreation.
Thethreat:Organizationsthatapplytraditionalinvest-mentframeworkstoagenticAIsystematicallyunderinvestincontinuouslearningandadaptation,leadingtorapidvaluedecaywhilethecompoundreturnsavailablefromintegratedAIecosystemsaremissed.
Theopportunity:CompaniesthatembracehybridinvestmentmodelsanddiversifiedAIportfolioscancre-atecompoundingreturnsastheirsystemslearn,adapt,andgenerateunforeseencapabilitiesacrossmultipleautonomylevelsandbusinesscontexts.Thewindowforestablishingthisstrategicadvantageisnarrowingascompetitivepres-suresintensifyandtechnologicalevolutionaccelerates.Thequestionisn’twhethertoresolvethesetensionsbut,rather,howquicklyorganizationsadapttheirinvestmentframeworkstomatchtherealityofagenticAI.
3.TheControlTension:SupervisionVersusAutonomy
Toolsarefullyownedandcontrolled,behavingpredict-ablyoncedeployed.Workersmustbemanagedthroughcontracts,incentives,andoversightbecausehumanshaveautonomyandmaypursuedivergentgoals.AgenticAIrequiressupervisionandmanagementlikeaworkerdoes
Unliketraditionaltoolswithpredictableupgradecycles,agenticAIrequires
continuousadaptationandlearning.
8MITSLOANMANAGEMENTREVIEW?BCG
TheEmergingAgenticEnterprise:HowLeadersMustNavigateaNewAgeofAI9
+55%
37%
57%
+179%
14%
39%
+250%
10%
35%
0102030405060
NowIn3yearsPercentageofrespondentswhostronglyagreeoragreewitheachstatement.
AIsystems workwithambiguousinputs
AIsystemsworkindependently fromhumans
AIsystemshavedecision-makingauthority
FIGURE3
OrganizationsAnticipateContinuedIncreasesinAIAutonomy
SurveyrespondentsaretwotothreetimesmorelikelytoexpectAIsystemstoworkindependentlyfromhumansandhavedecision-makingauthorityinthreeyearscomparedtotoday.
becauseitsoutputscanbeunpredictable,eventhoughorganizationsownitlikeanautonomoustool.Howcanorganizationsdesignprocessestoeffectivelysuperviseanagentthatalsoworksautonomously?(seefigure3.)
Aprocessthatincludessupervisioninherentlykeepshumansinvolvedindecision-makingprocesses.Chevron’sConnornotes,“Wealwayshaveahumaninthelooptoreviewandanalyzetheoutputsowecandeterminewhetheritmakessenseornot.”ChandraKapireddy,for-merheadofgenerativeAI,machinelearning,andanalyticsatTruistBank,says,“Ifyoulookatthefinancialservicesindustry,Idon’tthinkthereisanyusecasethatisactually
customer-facing,affectingthedecisionsthatwewouldmakewithoutahumanintheloop.”1
Despiteowningthetechnology,organizationsmusttreatagenticAIsystemswiththesameoversighttypicallyreservedforhumanemployees.
Butatthesametime,organizationswantthebenefitsofscalethatAIagentscanofferwhileavoidingthebottle-necksthathumanoversightcouldcreate.Oneleaderwespokewithasked,“Howdoyoumakesurethatyouhavetherightsetofcontrolsinplace?We’recallingithuman-in-the-loop,or‘human-out-of-the-loop’forsomeofourlow-riskusecases.”Thedecisiontomovetohuman-out-
of-the-loopforlower-riskusecasesinvolvescontext-dependentassessmentsofrisk.Unlikeasimpletoolwithafixedfunction,agenticAIoperateswithinacomplexenvironmentwhereitsactionscanhaveunintendedconse-quences.Thatmeansorganizationsmustcraftpoliciesthatsetboundariesfordecision-makingandactiontoserveassafeguardssothatorganizationalbehaviorsalignwithstrategicobjectives,andnegativeoutcomesareprevented.Thisisanalogoustosettingpoliciesandprovidingover-sightforhumanemployees.SunatSAPdescribesbuildingagenerativeAIhubforthispurpose:“Throughthat,wecanthenconnecttodifferentlargelanguagemodels.Butwealsohavetheability,then,toputintheguardrailsforallthebusinessapplications.Wecanputinourownanalytics.Wecanputinourownsecurity,ourprivacy,ourcompli-ance,andsoon.”TheneedforthesecontrolshighlightsthefactthatAIisnotafullypredictabletoolbutanagentthatmanagersmustguideandconstrain.
Whenatoolmalfunctions,it’sadefect.Whenacoworkermakesamistake,it’samanagementandlearningoppor-tunity.ManagerscanapplythiscoworkermindsettoAI.RebeccaFinlay,CEOatthePartnershiponAI,arguesthatcompaniesneedtobemoretransparentabouttheirAIfailures:“Iwouldloveforustobeinapositionwherewecouldsharemoreaboutthingsthatgowrong,becauseinthatsharing,welearn.”ThisapproachtreatsAInotasaninfallibletoolbutasanagentwhoseerrorsmustbeunder-stood,managed,andlearnedfrom.Thelearningprocessparallelshoweffectiveteamshandlehumanerror.
Thethreat:OrganizationsthatfailtodevelopappropriategovernanceframeworksforagenticAImayfacecompli-ancefailures,misalignedoutputs,orrunawaysystemsthatdamagebusinessoperations.
Theopportunity:Companiesthatmastertheartofman-agingartificialcolleaguescanscalespecializedcapabilitieswithoutthetraditionalc
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 人教四年級數(shù)學下冊《從不同位置觀察一個用正方體搭成的結(jié)合組合體》示范課教學設計
- 2026年醫(yī)保經(jīng)辦綜合服務崗事業(yè)單位招聘考試筆試試題(含答案)
- 2026年煙草年度成本預算專員煙草公司招聘考試筆試試題(含答案)
- 2026 年 QCC 品管圈活動助推護理質(zhì)控提質(zhì)
- 2026 年急性白血病化療后粒缺伴發(fā)熱護理個案
- 2026年秋季康復治療專業(yè)開學第一課 專業(yè)技能培養(yǎng)路徑講座方案
- 2026年秋季心理學專業(yè)開學第一課 專業(yè)技能培養(yǎng)路徑講座方案
- 2026年秋季小學開學主題班會 學生營養(yǎng)與健康生活
- 適應障礙護理查房
- 無菌操作技術(shù)培訓試題及答案
- 初創(chuàng)公司財務規(guī)章制度
- 《神經(jīng)外科臨床診療指南(2025版)》
- 礦產(chǎn)勘查地質(zhì)學課件
- 感染性呼吸疾病“促防診控治康”一體化照護:共筑呼吸健康防線課件
- 高處作業(yè)吊籃安裝、拆卸、使用技術(shù)規(guī)程(2025版)
- 尿毒癥高磷血癥課件
- 養(yǎng)殖漏糞板施工方案
- 科普說明文介紹水母
- 2025年考研333教育綜合真題+答案
- 叉車考試試題及答案
- 精神康復治療師考核試題及答案
評論
0/150
提交評論